Showing posts with label classic. Show all posts
Showing posts with label classic. Show all posts

Friday, July 10, 2015

East of Eden


East of Eden
John Steinbeck
5 / 5


Published 1952

First Sentence
"The Salinas Valley is in Northern California."
Publisher's Description:
Set in the rich farmland of California’s Salinas Valley, this sprawling and often brutal novel follows the intertwined destinies of two families—the Trasks and the Hamiltons—whose generations helplessly reenact the fall of Adam and Eve and the poisonous rivalry of Cain and Abel. Here Steinbeck created some of his most memorable characters and explored his most enduring themes: the mystery of identity; the inexplicability of love; and the murderous consequences of love’s absence.

Dear Reader,

When I was on the second leg of a flight to Miami at the very end of 2003*, my seatmate was reading this book and raved to me about it (I unfortunately cannot recall what I was reading at the time, although I am certain it was something not nearly as literary). I have had it on my to-read list (at the time, it was a pen & paper version that I carried around in my Filofax for years!) ever since. And boy, am I glad I finally got around to it!!! What a gorgeous epic of, well, epic proportions. This retelling of the Cain & Abel story was so masterfully done - although, would you expect anything less from Steinbeck? I loved his take on the tale, and how he made things work out in the end. This wasn’t quite up to par with The Grapes of Wrath for me (perhaps because it wasn’t quite so political, so I didn’t feel as if it had a motive other than the telling of a great story), but it was certainly nonstop enjoyable. 

Samuel Hamilton and Lee were by far my favorite characters. I wanted to just sit down and hang out with those two. They were down to earth and yet had these amazing views on the world. If you read the book for nothing else, read it for the passages where one of them discourses about the meaning of life. So worth it. 

I also just loved how Steinbeck inserted himself into the periphery of the novel, as if this was a story he himself had experienced firsthand as a child. He made it feel as if he had watched it happen to someone else, to a neighbor his family was familiar but not close with. His childhood interactions with the main characters made the story feel so much more real. What a clever device. 

Wikipedia says that Steinbeck used the novel as a vehicle for describing the Salinas Valley to his then-young sons. I find that fascinating, because yes, the Valley itself is almost another character entirely - it certainly informs the story and the movements of the characters, for better or for worse. I can see this book being an ode, a love letter, to the area -  its lushness and verdancy in good years, as well as its leanness and cruelty in bad ones. I was fascinated to see my home state of Connecticut feature in the book, as well - although clearly it is not a place that Steinbeck favors. 

Speaking of places, I also loved the title - the phrase referring to the location of the Land of Nod, where Cain was exiled after having murdered his twin brother. I was fairly unfamiliar with the Biblical tale going into the book, but luckily Steinbeck offers quite a thoughtful and thorough exploration of the story (and its various interpretations). This book becomes a study on the possibility of hope in the face of fate, and whether you are bound by the blood that flows through your veins. I truly loved it. 

Yours,
Arianna

* If you haven’t experienced New Year’s Eve while wearing a sundress, you must! (Yes, even those of you who don’t regularly wear sundresses...hehe.)


East of Eden

Support Shelf Notes! Purchase your copy of this book here:

Paperback:
Kindle:

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

A Christmas Carol and Other Christmas Writings


A Christmas Carol and Other Christmas Writings
Charles Dickens
5/5


Published 1843

First Sentence
"Marley was dead: to begin with."

Publisher's Description:

'Merry Christmas!...every idiot who goes about with "Merry Christmas" on his lips, should be boiled with his own pudding'

Dickens' story of solitary miser Ebenezer Scrooge, who is taught the true meaning of Christmas by a series of ghostly visitors, has proved one of his most well-loved works. Ever since it was published in 1843 it has had an enduring influence on the way we think about the traditions of Christmas. Dickens' other Christmas writings collected here include 'The Story of the Goblins who Stole a Sexton', the short story from on which A Christmas Carol was based; The Haunted Man, a tale of a man tormented by painful memories; along with shorter pieces, some drawn from the 'Christmas Stories' that Dickens wrote annually for his weekly journals. In all of them Dickens celebrates the season as one of geniality, charity and remembrance.

This new selection contains an introduction by distinguished Dickens scholar Michael Slater discussing how the author has shaped ideas about the Christmas spirit, an appendix on Dickens' use of The Arabian Nights, a further reading list and explanatory notes.

Dear Reader,

Before I get into the review of this book, I wanted to give you a heads up that this review was written over two years ago. I thought it was an appropriate time to post it on shelfnotes and since I love this story by Dickens so much, I do try to pick it up and re-read it every year. Enjoy, and if you haven't read the story yet... what are you waiting for?!?

Oh, Dickens... you've done it again. Pulling at my heartstrings during this special time of year, Christmas. I'm so glad I decided to read this during the Holiday. You see, I'm always left with a bad feeling during Christmas because it makes me so neurotic. Cleaning, shopping, making food, parties, no time to do everything... CHAOS! I detest the feeling of "GO GO GO" and "BUY EVERYTHING". I wish we could live in the times when Christmas was all about giving to those in need and gathering round a table full of Christmas goodies and cheer.

Reading this has relaxed my anxiety during this Holiday season and I think this might become a tradition... Amber, you must read A Christmas Carol every year before you start going crazy from all the expectations. The characters are as wonderful as any others Dickens writes and the comedy is tenfold when it comes to Scrooge (as I viewed him before to what he is in the book). I think everyone should read "A Christmas Carol" before the Holiday and try and take the meaning to heart!

As for Dickens other stories in the book... my favorite was the "Christmas Tree". This story was unlike anything I would have expected out of Dickens and could very well be one of my favorite short stories of all time. It starts out describing a Christmas tree that we can all relate to and then meanders through life through the telling of tales that relate to the tree. Each story is philosophical and rich with description, enough to catch you off guard for a few paragraphs until you get into the flow again. This story was amazing and I highly recommend it to everyone.

Happy Reading,
AmberBug

A Christmas Carol and Other Christmas Writings

Support Shelf Notes! Purchase your copy of this book here: 

Saturday, October 4, 2014

Dead Souls


Dead Souls
Nikolai Gogol
3.5 / 5

Published 1842

First Sentence
"A rather handsome, light traveling carriage on springs rolled into the gates of an inn in a certain provincial capital, the kind of carriage that is favored by bachelors: retired lieutenant colonels, second captains, landowners possessing a hundred souls or so of serfs--in a word, all those who are called the fair-to-middlin' sort."
Publisher's Description:
Dead Souls is eloquent on some occasions, lyrical on others, and pious and reverent elsewhere. Nicolai Gogol was a master of the spoof. The American students of today are not the only readers who have been confused by him. Russian literary history records more divergent interpretations of Gogol than perhaps of any other classic.

In a new translation of the comic classic of Russian literature, Chichikov, an enigmatic stranger and schemer, buys deceased serfs' names from their landlords' poll tax lists hoping to mortgage them for profit and to reinvent himself as a gentleman.
Dear Reader,

I've been wanting to read some Gogol ever since reading The Namesake several years ago, as that novel revolves around the father having named his son after the Russian author he'd been reading when he survived a train crash. I'd heard good things about Gogol as well, although his name doesn't seem to be nearly as well known as Tolstoy or Dostoyevsky. However, those authors wouldn't even exist, perhaps, were it not for Gogol - he invented the notion of the flawed "anti-hero" - or at least made it popular.

I wish I had known going into the book that it was incomplete in a way: the author apparently finished writing it, but then destroyed parts of it shortly before his death; the book literally ends mid-sentence. I only realized that when I would hit so-called "hiatuses", where large chunks of the story were simply missing. I found that slightly frustrating, but not enough so that it detracted from the story. And the novel IS considered whole in its current state - which I find odd, but okay! Some (including Vladamir Nabokov) say that the storyline isn't really the point of the work, anyway.

What is the storyline?, you might ask. Well, this was the story of bumbling Chichikov, who travels around the Russian countryside asking every landowner he meets to sell him his "dead souls" - meaning, those serfs who were listed as alive during the last census, but have since died. I won't go into why he does this, because that is perhaps the most intriguing point of the book. Gogol goes into amazing descriptions of all of his characters - often digressing for long periods before returning to the main storyline - and his caricatures of Russians are endlessly amusing. He wrote characteristics of people and even animals really very well - all of their personalities loom larger than life in this book. And I think that was the best part about it, the descriptions that Gogol employed. He really cared about conveying whole pictures of each and every character he introduced to the reader. I understand now why this is an exemplar of Russian literature. Gogol certainly belongs up there with all of his other famous literary compatriots.

Yours,
Arianna

Dead Souls

Support Shelf Notes! Purchase your copy of Dead Souls here:

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

My Man Jeeves


My Man Jeeves
P.G. Wodehouse
4/5


Published 1919

First Sentence
"Jeeves - my man, you know - is really a most extraordinary chap."

Publisher's Description:

Who can forget our beloved gentleman's personal gentleman, Jeeves, who ever comes to the rescue when the hapless Bertie Wooster falls into trouble. My Man Jeeves is sure to please anyone with a taste for pithy buffoonery, moronic misunderstandings, gaffes, and aristocratic slapstick. 

Contents: 

"Leave It to Jeeves" 
"Jeeves and the Unbidden Guest" 
"Jeeves and the Hard-boiled Egg" 
"Absent Treatment" 
"Helping Freddie" 
"Rallying Round Old George" 
"Doing Clarence a Bit of Good" 
"The Aunt and the Sluggard"

Dear Reader,

Many have pushed me to read P.G. Wodehouse (Arianna included), and I FINALLY decided to give in to the awesomeness. The clever, cute and charming loveliness of the book didn't come as much of a surprise to me since I've been told about these books so many times before. My favorite characters had to be Jeeves and Bertie, so quirky and reminiscent of that slapstick humor that is greatly lacking in media today. The jokes are clever and simple but so much fun. I just wish all the stories revolved around Bertie and Jeeves, they stole the show. The other stories in the book were good, but it's hard to start of a collection with the best... my interest towards the end started yearning for another one of Jeeves' brilliant ideas. Wodehouse clearly knows how to finish off a good joke, he has such a great way of saying "Tada! Look how clever". I think everyone should pick up a Wodehouse book or two, I've clearly become a fan and can't wait to read the next one (but maybe in a few months - the stories tend to meld and I don't want them to lose the magic).

Happy Reading,
AmberBug

My Man Jeeves (Jeeves, #1)

Support Shelf Notes! Purchase your copy of this book here:

Left: Hardcover - Right: E-Book

Sunday, July 13, 2014

The Picture of Dorian Gray (Review by AmberBug)


The Picture of Dorian Gray
Oscar Wilde
4.5/5


Published 1890

First Sentence
"The artist is the creator of beautiful things."

Publisher's Description:

Oscar Wilde's story of a fashionable young man who sells his soul for eternal youth and beauty is one of his most popular works. Written in Wilde's characteristically dazzling manner, full of stinging epigrams and shrewd observations, the tale of Dorian Gray's moral disintegration caused something of a scandal when it first appeared in 1890. Wilde was attacked for his decadence and corrupting influence, and a few years later the book and the aesthetic dilemma it presented became issues in the trials occasioned by Wilde's homosexual liaisons. Of the book's value as autobiography, Wilde noted in a letter, "Basil Hallward is what I think I am: Lord Henry what the world thinks me: Dorian what I would like to be--in other ages, perhaps.


Dear Reader,

This is THAT book. The book that you know exists, you know you should read, you can even confidently say you know you'll enjoy it... but haven't read it yet. I'm in my mid 30's and I just read THIS book, the book that I know is the perfect classic for me. It has the creep factor, the large and thoughtful ideas, the punch in the stomach, and the shock value! ALL of this is included in your very own copy of "The Picture of Dorian Gray" and yet, I had not read it yet. No longer! I can now say that I've read THIS classic that has all those traits I love. This wasn't my favorite "classic" book, but it surprisingly didn't disappoint. My expectations were completely met with this book. I wasn't overly impressed but on the same token, wasn't disappointed.

So if you're anything like me, you know the basics behind the story but I'll fill you in anyways. There's this guy named Dorian Gray, a wealthy young gentleman who associates with the aristocrats and artists of his time. He befriends a particular artist that develops a slight obsession with Dorian while painting his portrait. After the portrait is painted, Dorian wishes that the painting could hold all of his sins and his age. Why? Well, because of his corrupt and incorrigible "friend" Lord Henry. This man is despicable and corrupts Mr. Gray slowly and surely throughout the story. His first known "corruption" deals with convincing and lecturing Dorian on age and pointing out that this painting of him will forever be younger than Mr. Gray himself. So, from the beginning, we see Dorian as a nice enough guy, one who thinks well of others and has good intentions BUT he starts getting a little self involved (especially on his looks). So Dorian looks upon this newly painted portrait of himself and begins to hate what it represents... AGING! He wishes the painting could hold his sins and age and all of a sudden "poof", (we find out a little later on) this is EXACTLY what has happened. Boy, oh boy... could you imagine a gift more important than that? You get to live forever AND not suffer from your sins? That can't backfire can it? Hahahahaha.

Poor Dorian Gray, we see his slow descent into corruption, becoming an overall terrible human being. He becomes even worse than Lord Henry, which I would have never guessed that could happen. Without giving the ending away, I must say... this story has a lot going for it, SO many "morals". To delve a little deeper below the surface, we start to realize that Lord Henry gives us TONS of fuel to fire our inner rage. How can you not be upset when he acts as if women have no worth, the only person that matters is yourself and you shouldn't care about anything else. Ugh, so frustrating to read his lengthy horrible spouts of monologues. I think Arianna said it nicely, in her review of this book. She had a hard time liking it because the characters had such horrible qualities, and I completely agree with Arianna on this one. It was hard to finish the book because I hardly cared for Dorian by the end.

I still feel strongly about the depth of ideas the Author was trying to convey, so deep that I have a hard time describing what that IS. I keep coming back to the conscience and relating it to the "Pinocchio" story. Just like Pinocchio, Dorian has a friend that leads him astray (Honest John the Fox was the character who led Pinocchio astray). Pinocchio ends up being coaxed to Pleasure Island and we find out "IT'S A TRAP". This is similar to what Lord Henry does to Dorian with all his talk on egotistical philosophy, which ultimately leads Dorian to his own Pleasure Island (that magical place where you can be completely selfish and disregard the emotions of others). You want to scream at the book and at Dorian, telling him to STOP listening to Lord Henry and START listening to his conscience. At one point, the star-struck Artist comes to speak with Dorian and tries to warn him of this dark path he is going down (like Jiminy Cricket?), but at this point Dorian is too far gone and finds his help insulting. I won't go into what happens from that point on, this is something that you have to find out on your own. I can't say I really enjoyed reading the book per se, but I do think Oscar Wilde made a very large statement with it. I think this is an important read, it delves into subjects that very few books bring up (or none that speak too deeply on the subjects), I would most certainly recommend it as a classic and one not to miss.

Happy Reading,
AmberBug

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (Harry Potter, #4)

Support Shelf Notes! Purchase your copy of this book here:

Thursday, July 3, 2014

Winesburg, Ohio


Winesburg, Ohio
Sherwood Anderson
3 / 5

Published 1919

First Sentence
"The writer, an old man with a white mustache, had some difficulty in getting into bed."
Publisher's Description:
To Sherwood Anderson, more than to any other American Writer, belongs the distinction of having converted mere sectional writing into a universal experience. As the interpreter of mid-western life, he wrought a change in mood and method that was revolutionary. His masterpiece,Winesburg, Ohio, became the forerunner of a new and vital school of contemporary humanity, its inescapable conviction of truth and its brooding, tender insight make it a book by which Anderson has earned a leading rank among the important novelists of America and certainly among the best of our storytellers.

Dear Reader,

Fun fact: This book was published on my birthday...62 years before I was born (yes, you can do the math if you want).  That's pretty neat.  Apparently it was a Thursday.  Not sure if that was just a random day, or if publishers released books on that day of the week regularly, like how Tuesday is the preferred day for releases these days.

In any case, to get to the book itself: it was all right.  I didn't love it, perhaps because it didn't feel like any character was given enough time for me to become familiar with.  This is due to it being a collection of related stories, rather than a cohesive novel.  I am not much for short stories (although Short Story Thursdays has helped me overcome that!), but this book appealed to me because it connected everyone's stories - you would be reading about one townsperson's tragic history, and you'd encounter characters who you had already met (with varying levels of intimacy) earlier in the work.  That was an enjoyable aspect.  The particularly outstanding character, who seemed to be at least mentioned in everyone's stories, was George Willard.  I think Anderson ultimately is telling George's story through examining those of his fellow townspeople, and how the character's life is affected by them in so many different ways.

Anderson particularly seems to enjoy examining how people experience loneliness and isolation, even in the midst of a (small) town.  His characters almost all seem desperate and unhappy lost souls.  All of the characters seem to believe that nobody else could possibly understand or connect with them, and so they give up before they even try.  One wonders if that is characteristic of this small town which Anderson is writing about, or if he is indicating that this is more of a pandemic which was affecting small-town America in the early 1900s.  It was especially interesting to note the time pre-industrial revolution time period, when not everyone seemed eager to move to the city.  Some want to flee the small town life, but most are content (enough) with their lot.

On a different note, I did find it quaint and charming how the book actually deals quite a bit with sex, but never mentions it by name.  Many women end up pregnant out of wedlock, and several of the men are Lotharios, but never once is the subject of sex broached so that people could cry indecency and ban the book.  I mean, not to say Anderson kept his book proper to that end.  I am guessing that was more because of the times during which it was written.  But it was still interesting to read and be forced to kind of read between the lines to get the true understanding of what Anderson was trying to convey.

Yours,
Arianna

Winesburg, Ohio

Support Shelf Notes! Purchase your copy of Winesburg, Ohio here:

Friday, January 3, 2014

Les Misérables


Les Misérables
Victor Hugo,
Norman Denny (Translator)
5/5


Published 1862

First Sentence (Preface from Original Publisher)

"So long as there shall exist, by virtue of law and custom, decrees of damnation pronounced by society, artificially creating hells amid the civilization of earth, and adding the element of human fate to divine destiny; so long as the three great problems of the century - the degradation of man through pauperism, the corruption of woman through hunger, the crippling of children through lack of light - are unsolved: so long as social asphyxia is possible in any part of the world; - in other words, and with a still wider significance, so long as ignorance and poverty exist on earth, books of the nature of Les Miserables cannot fail to be of use."


HAUTEVILLE HOUSE, 1862




Publisher's Description:
‘He was no longer Jean Valjean, but No. 24601’
Victor Hugo’s tale of injustice, heroism and love follows the fortunes of Jean Valjean, an escaped convict determined to put his criminal past behind him. But his attempts to become a respected member of the community are constantly put under threat: by his own conscience, when, owing to a case of mistaken identity, another man is arrested in his place; and by the relentless investigations of the dogged policeman Javert. It is not simply for himself that Valjean must stay free, however, for he has sworn to protect the baby daughter of Fantine, driven to prostitution by poverty. A compelling and compassionate view of the victims of early nineteenth-century French society, Les Misérablesis a novel on an epic scale, moving inexorably from the eve of the battle of Waterloo to the July Revolution of 1830.
Norman Denny’s introduction to his lively English translation discusses Hugo’s political and artistic aims in writing Les Misérables.

Dear Reader,

This epic novel by Victor Hugo was quite surprising a treat. I think the enchantment felt was partially due to the lack of knowledge I had of this popular story. I've never seem any of the films or ventured out to see the play. Anyone who has ever read this will know Hugo tends to digress into many topics which stray from the story itself. Not knowing this, the first digression choked me like swallowing on a huge pill. But slowly, after each one... I started to enjoy his digressions and actually wanted more. Hugo has a wonderful mind and really delves into some thought provoking ideas. All this stimulating writing has me highlighting like crazy.

For example, I loved the way Hugo compared a prison to a monastery and a convict to a nun, never would I have even thought to compare the two, but what a comparison it is!! I also loved the entire rant on slang; this topic is still being debated today. The slang of long ago is proper speech today which strengthens the argument even more. He brings a refreshing look at what slang really is and how it should be treated. Progress... we must be open to it.

One of my favorite characters in the book was actually a very minor character but one which brought about Hugo's rant of slang. Gavroche, the street urchin who creates a nest in an elephant sculpture, has such cheer and resourcefulness for a child with nothing. This is admirable but Gavroche's true charm lies with his slangy speech. He speaks chock full of cute world for ordinary things and he always corrects others when they use "proper" speech. His part is short but his character is so heartwarming and odd that it stuck with me.

Okay, so... this story is aptly names, "The Miserable Wretches", be warned! EVERYONE has horrible things happen to them! However, I think a happy ending is quite overrated and usually enjoy the nitty gritty truth better. I'll leave you with this quote straight out of the ending of the book: "It is a terrible thing to be happy! how content one is! How all-sufficient one finds it! How, being in possession of the false object of life, happiness, one forgets the true object, duty!"

It was Hugo's duty to deliver us a story with depth and feeling (not one of those dull, heard it all before stories). With this, he has success... END of story.

Happy Reading,
AmberBug
Support ShelfNotes! Buy your copy of Les Misérables here:
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...